In other news from the Goolag, if you’ve been following the battle over the European Parliament’s passing of the new Copryight Directive, one of the core group of Members of the European Parliament who helped get the legislation passed was the Green Party’s Helga Truepel. As David Lowery notes in this post on The Trichordist and in many other posts, Big Tech misused political communication tools to spam Members of the European Parliament with the hope of tricking them into thinking that there were actual constitutents who opposed the new Copyright Directive.
Remember that there have been two votes, with yesterday’s victory being the second vote. Our side lost the first vote following the first astroturf spam campaign. But–not only did Google get called out about it in The Trichordist, the London Times, FAZ and a bunch of other publications also confirmed David’s research. Did that stop Google? Nope. They did it again in the run up to yesterday’s vote. As Blake Morgan often says, Goliath never learns.
In a press conference at the European Parliament after yesterday’s vote, MEP Truepel answered a question from a journalist seeking an explanation of why the vote changed so radically–dozens of MEPs actually switched their votes to pass the Directive yesterday.
MEP Truepel said that she thought it was because MEPs were pissed off by the Google-backed astroturf campaign that was so offensively transparent–but not in a good way–that massively backfired on Google. Of course, not only has it backfired, but Google (and, in fairness, Facebook) was exposed as the prime mover behind the attack, which came right before the European Commission announced yet another multi-billion fine against Google for violating European competition law.
MEP Truepel also announced that she was going to meetings at the Googleplex–aka Spamalot–in the near future to discuss the role of Google in Europe. Oh, that should just be a bunch of LOLs.
Start at 14:45:10 You HAVE to watch this. When asked why EU Parliament switched from opposing the copyright directive to overwhelmingly supporting it, German MEP Helga Truepel pulls no punches: “I think it’s due to this message spamming campaign. I talked to some of my collegues here [and they] are totally pissed off […]
via “Totally Pissed Off” By Big Tech Spam EU Gives Artists A Copyright Victory — The Trichordist
Networked Propaganda Online activists and lobbyists are using digitally manipulated protests and misinformation to fight a copyright reform in Europe. They know what they are doing. Do Members of the European Parliament know what this is about? A guest commentary. Translated from original German text: http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/von-lobbiysten-die-das-urheberrecht-bekaempfen-15773233.html “History doesn’t repeat itself, it just writes the bill,” […]
via Networked Propaganda- Guest Post by Stefan Herwig. — The Trichordist
Guest Post by Volker Rieck. Translated from German.
Astroturf instead of grass roots: When clicktivism meets hard reality.
Last weekend, several organizations called for a “Day of Action” with demonstrations throughout Europe against the planned EU Copyright Directive.
Among the supporters of the events were the Pirate Party, the Left, the Greens and the network association Loade.V. (FDP).
The saveyourinternet.today website created an overview map of all 27 demonstrations.
In any case the cards weren’t put on the table. Again.
Read the post on The Trichordist Dismal Turnout For Anti-Copyright Directive Protests in EU Suggests Little Real Opposition — The Trichordist
Who Hacked the EU Copyright Directive Deliberations? The EU parliament just went through a couple of contentious weeks in which they were overwhelmed with tweets, letters, emails and phone calls opposing Article 13 a section of the Copyright Directive that would have forced companies like Google to police their platforms better for copyright infringement. Last […]
via The Google Funded Astroturf Group that Hacked The EU Copyright Vote (In Pictures) — The Trichordist
The only way I can think of that both Variety’s original statement and the correction could be true would be if there were a voluntary retroactive unmatched payment by the digital services as part of the deal for the Music Modernization Act. Even so, $1.5 billion is awfully generous, even for the biggest companies in commercial history. But then, if it is a voluntary payment, how would you ever know if it isn’t also voluntarily disclosed?
via Billions and Billions: Carl Sagan Meets the Music Modernization Act — Music Technology Policy
This is some funny shit. The below article apparently triggered the threat of defamation lawsuit. Is Google Running Hybrid Information Warfare Attack on EU Parliament? Obviously we’re getting close. Yes I know this is bullshit. (Google wouldn’t warn me) But clearly we’ve struck a nerve with someone close to Google and/or proxy groups. Be a […]
via YOU’VE GOT THREATS! Therefore We Must be on to Something — The Trichordist
The twitter account used in this example is largely dormant. Except every once in a while it is used to promote some suspect contest or website. Thousands of tweets use this exact same template. To be clear. This is not a robust statistical survey. It’s based on my random sampling of tweets to MEPs. But […]
via EU MEPs Hacked: More than Half #DeleteArt13 Tweets Appear to be from Sock Puppets — The Trichordist